A very simple thing that HA OEM’s could do right now to help guide users of rechargeable batteries is the same thing Apple does for its devices.

Just have a “Battery Health” monitoring function in the firmware/smartphone software. Not an Apple user long enough to know how reliable it is, but I open that applet for my 2.5 month-old Apple Watch, it says “100% Maximum Capacity” and “99% Maximum Capacity” for my iPhone 6S, which had its battery replaced a month or two before the wife stopped using it and later gave it to me. Her 2-year-old XS MAX reports something like 92% Maximum Capacity.

The point of this is that it simply gives you a real guestimate of where you’re heading with your usage habits for your Li-ion battery. You don’t have to wait until you’ve killed the battery to find out approximately how long the lifespan of your device is going to be if you keep operating the way you are.

Apple’s great web information has told me that I can expect my Apple Watch battery to last the equivalent of 1,000 full charge cycles before it drops to 80% of maximum capacity. My particular usage is such that I can go ~2 days on a full charge (I operate ~100% of time in Airplane Mode still using fitness and sleep monitoring all the time and HA control only as needed). And 2.5 months along, I haven’t dropped a % from full capacity. I would estimate the watch battery will last ~5.5 years (1,000 charges/183 charges/year, for me). My watch only charges wirelessly.

Unless Apple has somehow cornered the patents on such battery health monitoring and reporting, there is no reason HA OEM’s could not provide the same information to their users. The HA OEM’s may say a rechargeable HA will last 5 or 6 years but they give no idea of number of anticipated usable full charge cycles, no battery health reporting, no ability to set alerts when charging or discharging your HA battery (I guess it’s difficult enough, based on Google Play and App Store reviews, just to write a basic smartphone app that users have any respect for). HA OEM’s need to up their game when it comes to just even plain old low-tech rechargeable battery monitoring and better battery longevity parameters. Apple can do it but why not HA OEM’s?

@mazda4me said:

In any case it’s time for some company like (Apple) to reinvent wheel - and come out with hearing aids that don’t cost an arm and a leg, don’t need replacement parts (battery included) for five years and understand the meaning behind “consumer support” - versus don’t call us, we’ll call your. Or more likely a continual busy signal when you call and request aid service.

As the owner of many Apple products I can testify to their quality and long lasting trouble free servise.
But I can also testify to the fact that Apple never tries to make low cost products, on the contrary they will almost always be the highest priced items in all categories the compeat in. I am a happy Apple product user but very aware of the premium price for those products. I beleive Apple would make a good aid I am sure it would be at a premium price but I don’t think they are interested as the market for aids is not large enough to be of interest to them in my opinion.

Article in The Verge on wireless OTA charging via beam-forming (would reduce chore of keeping things charged):

Xiaomi says its ‘Air Charge’ technology works over several meters

It can charge multiple devices at the same time

Needless to say, you should be skeptical about the prospects of this technology making it to market until evidence suggests otherwise. Companies like Energous have been making announcements about “truly wireless charging” at CES and beyond for several years, but the technology is yet to gain serious traction. Xiaomi has demonstrated wireless charging engineering breakthroughs in the past, however, and has the advantage of owning a huge hardware ecosystem that it could theoretically leverage.

Xiaomi says its ‘Air Charge’ technology works over several meters1

The road to a ‘truly wireless’ living room

I agree Jim. Rechargeable HA’s in which it is nearly impossible to replace the batteries use up far more energy and expensive materials than just the tiny disposable batteries. Recycling the reusable HA’s through the used market or donating them to developing nations puts the technology in the hands of needy people for many years and extends the use of our precious resources. Given a choice, I would NEVER BUY RECHARGABLES! (unless they were user replaceable)

Glad you made it through Jim. I’m in Austin. We lost power for over 75 hours. It was close to freezing in our house. Literally!

@jim_lewis said:

But one of the first things that I did when power was restored was to buy on Amazon a solar-powered battery pack that holds 25,000 mAh charge when fully charged (can be charged by AC in advance of potential disaster or charged by solar, even on a cloudy day (slowly, then).

In reading further about my purchase, I see the sellers say that the device is mainly designed as a battery pack and recommend mainly charging it from AC current with a 5V/2A wall adapter (not supplied!) and say that solar charging via the panel is an auxiliary method. It would take ~83 hours to fully charge the battery pack with good solar input (~13 hours to fully charge 25,000 mAh battery pack with AC). That’s OK. What I plan to do, if I like the battery pack device, is to get a larger, pure solar panel that can provide the 5V/2A current that an AC adapter would provide. There are solar panels big enough that can generate a high enough voltage (>13 to 14 volts) to even charge a 12V lead acid car battery. I would think the bigger the panel, the better I’d do on cloudy days, too. (going up a learning curve on this from ~basement level knowledge!).

Great if you avoided frozen pipes. I ran water ~every 2 hours over the 2.5 days of no power but 2 of 4 outside pipes still frozen damaging the faucets mounted on them but the pipes themselves seem to have escaped. In more northern climes (and particularly in houses with basements), outside water pipes often have inside shut off valves to allow the exterior pipe and pipe inside the wall to be thoroughly drained for winter. Some people put “mittens” over the outside faucets but I just try to drip the water fast enough that it doesn’t freeze - but didn’t work for 2 of 4 pipes at 9 deg F!

Wow. Hope you had a fireplace!

@AbramBaileyAuD said:

Hope you had a fireplace!

Used the house central gas heater with a portable Yamaha inverter generator. It is able to run the house heater, a couple fridges, a freezer and a few lights. We are very fortunate.

I’ve a similar issue here. The downtime due to charging outweighs the lengthy use time.

USA Today article on maximizing phone battery life. Probably applies to HA’s, too, since I doubt HA OEM’s are using battery technology superior to that available in world-class phones… (emphasis on Huawei quote mine).

Apple says that when your iPhone “remain(s) at full charge for prolonged periods of time, battery health can be affected.”

Android phone manufacturers, including Samsung, say the same. “Do not leave your phone connected to the charger for long periods of time or overnight." Huawei says, “Keeping your battery level as close to the middle (30% to 70%) as possible can effectively prolong the battery life.”

The official word is to keep your phone charged – but not fully charged.

Your battery will automatically stop charging when it’s full, but in some cases, once it drops to 99%, it will need more energy to get back to 100. This constant cycle eats away at your battery’s lifespan. Most phones come with charging regulation options baked in for this reason.

(but do rechargeable HA’s come with charging regulation options baked in?!)

Source: Cellphone battery life: Should you charge your phone overnight or not? (usatoday.com)1