You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Not sure what to make of comments by new Costco audiologist
89 replies3.1k viewsLast reply
I’ve seen 3 different private audiologists and 3 different techs/audiologists at Costco. The one that has helped me the most is the tech from Costco. You just never know who will be the “best” for you. We are all different and results vary dramatically. Some of the things the private audiologists have told me were unbelievable; one didn’t even know as much as I did (from this site) about the expensive aids she was trying to sell me. Further, one of my family members, who went to Costco, actually was saved medically by a Costco tech who, after checking, advised she go to her doctor before the tech would proceed with hearing aids. She advised seeing the doctor as quickly as possible. A tumor was found behind the ear which was then removed. Thankfully it was found before it could do further damage. As it was, the hearing in that ear was completely gone! Thankful for this Costco tech!
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
I think you will have a hard time finding very many folks who where not afraid of the surgery. So that’s perfectly understandable.
Going through the evaluation process doesn’t mean you have to go through the surgery unless you are ready. Take your time and communicate with folks who have gone through the evaluation. There are a few folks here that have done it. So get some advice from them.
I wish you well.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
User990 offers great suggestions. Not all audiologists are up to date with the rapidly changing improvement in technology or criteria for surgery. I decided to take the plunge despite barely qualifying and never looked back. Yes, surgery is a process and some manage with less anxiety than others, but if continuing to be able to communicate well going forward is your goal, it might be worth the short term discomfort. Getting the full CI evaluation is about a 2 hour process and you are not obligated to get surgery if you qualify. It can give you more input to make your decision!
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Hello. In response to your recommendation to try the Enzo for severe loss, I have a couple of questions. I am wearing the Philips at home, not at work. Im not liking them. One issue is the volume is too high and I am having issues with the app so sometimes can’t turn it down. Anyway, if the volume is too high for me, with an 85db receiver, does that mean that I don’t need a for severe loss? And of the HAs in Costco, which (if any) would you say are more suited to me? At the moment I am preferring the KS10. (Oh and well done Wales in the World Cup!)
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
If you like the KS10 you might prefer the Sennheiser Sonite R from Costco. It uses the same system as the KS10. More power is unlikely to help you hear your higher frequencies but frequency lowering can. You could also ask hearing aid fitter to tweak the frequency lowering on the Phillips but it works notably differntly than the KS10 and Sennheiser.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
That’s what I thought. I undersstand more power in high frequencies is a waste of time if I have null response. I believe they only used a little but of . It is entirely possible that I like the KS10 because it is easy to use. I wouldnt say it is amazing. I just dont really know what I can feasibly expect to hear. I will look for reviews of the Sennheiser. What are the issues withe the Jabra and Rexton?
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
They’re both good hearing aids but neither have the same, fairly sophisticated system as the Sennheiser’s or KS10s.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
I’m confused by this statement, as I believe they all work similar to get the same results as SoundRecover.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Jabra (Resound) has just 3 settings. Rexton has more settings but is static. Sound Recover 2 is a dynamic system and lowers frequencies only when high frequency sounds are present. You are correct that they are all Frequency shifting systems. Edit: Frequency compression was the term I was looking for. If you want a ton of detail on this stuff see this: Frequency Lowering Fitting Assistants9
If you just want an intro, try the Audiology online classes.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Hey: we looked good in bits against the All Blacks too.
Costco’s range seems to be a bit adrift of the newest developments, but I’d agree with others in thinking about some .
The loudness issue you’re getting is probably a bit of gain averaging that your hearing aids do when fitted and what we call the downward spread of masking: which affects sloping losses.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
No, they use different underlying ideas.
Soundrecover mainly uses frequency compression while the DeMant stuff uses a cut and paste transposition method.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Yes different ideas to get the same result, but is it considered that SoundRecover is the “best” at this?
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
It varies by user, degree of implementation and situation.
Some people hate Soundrecover as it can cause loss of fidelity in upper octaves, others don’t mind it. Transposition works differently: if you drop sounds by an octave and sit them on a harmonic, they sound normal but lower. Just as if they came from someone with a lower (bass) voice, which is quite clever if you think about it.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
“Best” is in the eye of the beholder. Sound Recover 2 does allow lowering to lower frequencies than any of the others. (Down to 750 Hz compared to about 1500 Hz for most of the others.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
“Best” is in the eye of the beholder
Exactly, as I’ve used all of them myself, I found I didn’t like SoundRecover because of the audible artifacts that I couldn’t get rid of (which was mentioned by Un_bongo) no problem with the others, I didn’t need to go anywhere as low as SoundRecover, which I think would even make the artifacts worse.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
I didn’t need to go anywhere as low as SoundRecover, which I think would even make the artifacts worse.
For some of us Sound Recover was the only that even helped our profound high frequency hearing losses. I found it to do great for my hearing loss before getting cochlear implants.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Is how this works stated in the specs somewhere or would one have to dig into each brand’s white papers?
Is there a way to predict which approach will work better for a specific person or is it trial and error? Could the manufacturers not offer both options with a toggle?
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Yes Rick I remember you saying this a long time back, but as had the opportunity to try these side by side I was able to tell the difference, it’s the same with Autosence, it totally put me off Phonak models, remember I was a Phonakian for quite a while but moved onto ReSound and Signia for my needs.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Log in to reply to this topic.
Related discussions
Hearing Aids13 replies
Question and Answer17 replies
Audiologists and Hearing Aid Dispensers20 replies
Hearing Aids11 replies
Question and Answer47 replies