You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Oticon New Product: Oticon Reveal
175 replies10.6k viewsLast reply
The thing that intrigued me most about their announcement was the 25dB increase in power compared to the competition. However, looking at these datasheets, I don’t seem to see this increased power.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
It’s not an 25dB increase in power, it’s a claimed 25dB increase in gain. It’s all to do with the feedback optimizer. The claim is that more gain can be applied without feedback occurring.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Outperforming competitors by delivering 25dB more gain.
That statement is qualified with an “up to” and “against 3 leading competitors” which means the worst performers could’ve been included depending on how they qualified “leading competitor”, which may not have actually included their feedback supression technology, but could’ve looked only at sales. We just don’t know.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Putting on my cynic’s hat for a moment… maybe the reason they are stressing ‘context’ so much is that they don’t do speech as well as their competitors?
Also, the dictionary definition of ‘context’:
Context is the background, setting, or surrounding circumstances that help explain an event, a statement, or a word.
I can see it makes sense that the sound of a magpie singing is the context to someone remarking on how beautiful the birdsong is. Most of the time, though, what they are calling ‘context’ is noise. Our needs and wants change as our hearing changes. As of now, context is a whole lot less important to me than understanding what my kids are saying.
Also, I’m sick of the numbers.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Our needs and wants change as our hearing changes. As of now, context is a whole lot less important to me than understanding what my kids are saying.
Exactly!
This is worrying. I am very lucky to have been able to afford both the Intents and the Spheres. My view is that the Intents are the superior device (for my specific severe to profound loss), mainly because they achieve consistent and stable gain, especially in the high frequencies, wheras Autosense jumps around too much and in my view attenuates the gain too much in it’s various programs.
However the Spheres trump card is the denoiser in very loud noise. This is where I swap the Intents for the Spheres, literally, on a couple of occassions recently. But honestly, if the Intents performed as well as the Spheres in very loud noise I would never wear the Spheres again. So what have Oticon done here? I am baffled. Is there an improvement in speech in noise in loud situations or not?
Is it the case that there is no improvement and we are being gas lit with all this contextual stuff? As @d_Wooluf says is this a tacit admission that they are not doing conversation as well as the nearest competitors? If true this is concerning and won’t also solve the big elephant in the room, which is group situations in very noisy environments, which ironically Oticon have always banged on about since the release of the OPN in 2016. I am completely confused.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Just a short question in this context. If I have a -adjusted program based on a certain fitting formula (VAC+ in my case) and then change the fitting formula to the new NAL formula, the software will re-calculate gains based on the new formula and the REM-adjustments will be lost? So if the REM introduced significant changes, the new formula may not really offer any improvement?
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Yes gone, but you don’t “loose” anything! No one can tell you if you’ll get “improvements” or not, you’ll just have to experiment yourself to see
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Hi everyone! Does anyone know when a new hearing aid will replace the Xceed SP? It’s been almost 7 years since the last update. Has anyone heard any news about a new model or a possible release date?
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Yeah, I’d really like to give NAL-NL3 a try.
I guess that won’t be possible with the Intents. Not surprised…
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
As far as we know, Oticon has no plans to update the Xceed now. It seems that the UP bte hearing aid market is too small and their focus is on hearing aids which bring them the most revenue. I suggest you go to a competitor like Phonak or Starkey because Oticon probably won’t have them for much longer.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
I’ve been playing around with Genie 2026.2, and I’ve noticed a few things:
-
Feedback management control (off, low, normal) is gone.
-
NAL-NL3 is available only for the new Reveal.
-
From what I saw in Genie 2 2026.2, it does seem like the Reveals are indeed an incremental step from the previous generation (Intents). For instance, the “MoreSound Intelligence” of the previous hearing aids is renamed “Reveal Clarifier” for the Reveals. It looks like they have essentially the same functionality and controls, but with a different UI and the hyped-up “AI” replacing the former buzzword “Neural” in the noise suppression (why not?).
Since I’m not able to fit the Intents with NAL-NL3, I simulated an NAL-NL3 prescription using the Reveals and then manually copied the target gains back to my Intents, using a template with the formula. I don’t know whether this will actually give me NAL-NL3 on my Intents, but it is what it is. I’m going to give my “NL3” a try now.
I noticed that NAL-NL3 prescribes less gain for loud inputs/curves and in the low-frequency region, and uses a different compression rationale, at least for my hearing loss. The screenshots below show the NAL-NL2 and NAL-NL3 targets for comparison (my and the Reveals).

You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Log in to reply to this topic.
Related discussions
Hearing Aids91 replies
Hearing Aids28 replies
Hearing Aids2 replies
Fitting Software Requests1.1k replies
Hearing Aids9 replies






