Sorry to be the Negative Nelly here, but we can talk “waterproof” or “oil-proof” all we want but it has been and will remain a misnomer of sorts.
True, the Aquaris aids are, in fact, made to be used during swimming and such activities. They require quite a bit more upkeep in that the aids have to be sent in once a year to be re-sealed and such. I don’t have any patients in them who actually SWIM with them however, so I can’t realistically speak to that claim.
But as for the other aids, even my beloved Starkey, as well as GN Resound, other Siemens aids and Oticon - DO NOT be fooled by this “proof” word…please. Great strides have been made in moisture proofing, there is no doubt about that! But if aids were TRULY water/oil/moisture proof then I would not see aids with corrosion, visible condensation and the like.
Does this happen MUCH less often than even a year ago? YES But does it happen more often than I would like? YES
And be careful when reading about aids being resistant to water. These demonstrations of aids being dunked in water or images of aids with visible water droplets rolling off of the aids make me itch. They make me uncomfortable because they are very convincing (which is their purpose) but there is also a big difference between WATER and SWEAT. There is also quite a difference between rinsing or dunking an aid and the aid being exposed day after day, month after month to sweat and body oils.
So kids, Negative Nelly says, aids are much more moisture resistant today than last year, but not 100%. Just beware.
dr.amy