Jury duty with severe to profound hearing loss

I’m in the UK and in my 30s. Never been called for Jury Service. Have no idea why.

Mistakenly my twin brother has been called 4 years ago, despite being a Police Officer for 16 years.

In Massachusetts they are terrible about providing accommodations. You won’t have any problem if you don’t want to serve. The discrimination is against those who do.

Hi all. Don’t know if this thread is still active, but looking for some advice. Was called for jury duty in Miami-Dade county recently (last time was a few years ago).

Back in December 2020 I was diagnosed with an acoustic neuroma (tumor of the ear nerve) on my left side by my ENT via MRI & audiology test, & had it surgically removed in February 2021 resulting in complete/total hearing loss. Hearing in my right ear is still good (but not perfect).

Would this type of hearing loss situation be able to get me permanently excused? Since hearing loss isn’t considered a form of impairment or disability. Anyone had a similar experience? Can’t add the older age excuse (I’m 48).

Also have a tough time hearing conversations clearly in a crowded room (& sometimes if someone is far away) even with the other ear. Can’t use a traditional hearing aid for this type of loss either, it’s a special kind that’s very expensive.

Would a copy of my audiology test that I took before the surgery (which already showed almost no hearing left in my left ear) be sufficient enough? Or should I include a letter from my ENT (or even the surgeon who operated on me) stating that I completely lost my hearing on the left side due to my acoustic neuroma & now have trouble hearing even with one ear?

Thanks in advance. Very new to this, so have a lot of questions & concerns.

I’m not American, but I would guess you’d need a letter from your audiologist. People without hearing loss, or even with mild bilateral hearing loss, have a hard time understanding how single sided loss impacts hearing.

Though, my personal bias is that all courtrooms should offer live captions and streamed audio like dan’s county did, and that many people with hearing loss would be able to serve with these supports.

@nyc79 said:

Can’t use a traditional hearing aid for this type of loss either, it’s a special kind that’s very expensive.

I’m having the opposite problem in supposedly enlightened Massachusetts. They are routinely bumping people with hearing loss who want to serve. The jury questionnaire asks is you need an assistive listening device, and when you get to the courthouse jury room you find no one knows what are where they are. I spent an embarrassing 15 minutes of everyone having to sit in the courtroom while they continued looking for the ALDs. But even after they were found, I was bumped.

@carolagate said:

I spent an embarrassing 15 minutes of everyone having to sit in the courtroom while they continued looking for the ALDs.

Embarrassing for them.

They didn’t seem to be the least bit embarrassed. I told the judge I was unable to get one in the jury room and I would need one before she explained the facts of the case. She called the clerk over, the clerk disappeared for 15 minutes, returned, handed it to me, and then the judge continued speaking. I was obviously the one who caused the delay and there was no explanation or apology from the judge.

Your experience is strange. I’m in Massachusetts and wanted to serve on a jury. When I saw the jury questionnaire I was pleased that they asked if an ALD was needed. I checked the box, got there, and found no one knew what an ALD is or where it was. It took them a looooong time to find it, while everyone had to sit and wait because of me. Then I got excused even tho’ I didn’t want to be. I guess each county is different in their attitude toward accommodations.