This is fresh. I never heard this before. Phonak do this? they defeature on 312 battery version because of this?
It isn’t new. Here’s my response:
-
I think this belief originated with Phonak’s omission of touch and motion based features from the 312 and 13 versions of the Paradise . I researched the tiny accelerometers used for these features, and concluded that voltage and current limitations aren’t a credible reason for omitting them from those versions.
-
The posts on theoretical advantages of higher voltage are about theory, not practice.
-
Disposable batteries’ peak current output limits do restrict hearing aid designers, particularly in the area of Bluetooth and streaming AFAIK. But when manufacturers of implants needed more output than even 675 hearing aid batteries could provide, battery makers came through with 675 implant batteries. So it seems that disposable batteries can be improved, if the manufacturers want them to be.
Some may argue “Hey, you can charge your smartphone every night; why not hearing aids?”.
It isn’t a good argument. Smartphones are consumer electronics devices. Hearing aids are prostheses:
Hearing aids have been powered by disposable zinc-air batteries for years. The technology is well-established, and so is the supply chain. Smartphones are available only with rechargeable batteries.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
.
