I had good lows pre op. I still have good lows post op. Getting a didn’t effect my lows at all. But it did effect my high frequencies, I list the standard 20% high frequencies. And they managed to preserve my residual hearing. Sadly my residual dropped out 15 months post op.
Well, I had a strategy, but it is out of our control. I hoped to preserve my good low frequency hearing and use the acoustic ear hook attachment for my Advanced bionics . My surgeon from Vanderbilt university - a leader in CI research - said it is pretty much a 50/50 shot. I was surprised and thought a surgeon would boast better results. I was quite concerned. I did not keep any residual hearing, but it has not bothered me as much as I thought. The CI has helped me a lot. I enjoy most types of music, including classical and opera. I used to play piano, but am certainly not a musician. I use the Phonak Marvel Link in my other ear and find it helps provide more warmth to the music. I do not capture the melodies as much as I’d like with just my CI, but with both, I find it a pleasing experience, even if different. Music specific rehab can help. I played around a bit on my daughter’s piano and did have some success better differentiating high notes after some work. It might be like the electronic keyboard vs the true piano - there a depth and richness to the real thing…however the real thing is mostly gone or none of us would be on this forum…so.
Your hearing journey is not over.
I definitely am still learning to hear better.
Music is a challenge but getting better the more I listen to it. As are all sounds around me. Just paying attention is all it seems to take.
I’m an orthopaedic surgeon. My wife is an surgeon. The point is well taken. I am evidence-based to a fault and would feel terrible if I misrepresented risks/benefits to my patients, but that is definitely not a universal n my field…
That’s fair. Basis; this engineers personal experiences with surgeons, discussions with surgeons about surgeons, particularly with regard surgery for hearing. Maybe it’d be more accurate to specify “good engineers.”