@cvkemp - Excuse me, but speaking as a wearer of Phonak devices for over 20 years, isn’t this something that the manufacturer is responsible for? I take excellent care of any device that I own. If I pay $5,000 for a pair of small devices that I wear 24/7, I expect it to work for at least 3-5 years without issue unless it is a user-inflicted problem like accidentally dropping it, accidentally submerging it in water, etc. (none of which happened to mine).
At $5,000 for a pair of small devices, I expect the manufacturer to have put in the proper engineering, QA, and testing required for it to work 24/7 for my loss. And as a $5,000 device that is rated as a UP device just like my Phonaks are, it should work pretty much the same, save for differences in company parts, signals, engineering practices, etc. All of which should be standard in accordance with industry practices.
And the devices, at $5,000, certainly should not present with random reboots 2-3 times per day during the course of “normal” operation through no fault of my own. I’m sorry, but I’m going to have to respectfully disagree with you there. And certainly, at $5,000, the warranty replacement device should absolutely not be present with one of the same freaking problems as the original one was.
In this case, it’s clear that for whatever reasons, the aids I received did not get the appropriate testing or QA at whatever part of the process before being put in the hands of the audiologist. And I put that blame SQUARELY on Oticon. Not my use of it, which is what it should have been engineered for. If they are going to call it a UP device, then it better be working 24/7 for my loss without any gaps in coverage just like my Phonaks.
Not break down at the slightest sign of difficulty.