Can anyone tell me the difference between a “regular” MLxi receiver and a Roger X receiver which looks exactly the same.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
This topic is closed.
6 replies700 viewsLast reply
Can anyone tell me the difference between a “regular” MLxi receiver and a Roger X receiver which looks exactly the same.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
I have not knowingly came across a MLxi receiver @Gilbert, I have 6 Roger X receivers though, 2 x type 03, 4 x type 02, a quick Google produced these below, I don’t know if they are any use though to you, information wise… Cheers Kev ![]()
The Phonak Roger X (03) Receiver is a small discrete ear level receiver that when connected to a Roger wireless microphone provides good speech and sound over distance to a person with hearing loss. The type 03 receiver connects easily to any of...
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Analog signal and digital signal.

Sound is so much better with Roger. None of it sounding like a radio. MLXi is FM signal.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
So, although they both receive , they are not interchangeable.
Would either of them be any use to receive FM hearing assistance in a theatre?
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
MLXi is but you need a receiver with the correct channel as the theatre.
When I was at school, I was on H02. H is used in the UK. USA and other countries use other channels that isn’t H.
It was illegal for me to go to the USA and use the FM system with H02 as the H channel could be police channel in the USA.
Roger can be used in any country without any issues.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
@Zebras Many thanks for the clarification. I have an Oticon MLxi receiver which can scan for nearby broadcasts. I will try this in the theatre which broadcasts .
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Hearing Aids6 replies
Question and Answer9 replies
Hearing Aids3 replies
Uncategorized452 replies
Fitting Software Requests514 replies