Skip to content
HearingTracker
Log in

Starkey Evolv AI IIC v Phonak Virto Paradise IIC

This topic is closed.

6 replies1.7k viewsLast reply

Link to this topic

Hi

I’ve been using the Phonak Virto Belong for the last 4 years and I’m due to buy new hearing aids.

I was wondering if anyone could tell me which is best out of the Starkey Evolv IIC and Phonak Virto Paradise IIC.

I understand that the Phonak has Autosense OS 4.0 instead of 3.0.

What attracts me to the Starkey is the fact that it can do 55 million personalised adjustments every hour.

Thanks.

Paul

5 people in this conversation2 min readJump to latest
Getting Fitted for Starkey Evolv AI 2400 CIC Tomorrow. What Should I Know?
Hi everyone, After a couple of false starts with the Lyric 4 and the Signia Silk X my audi suggested I try the Starkey Evolv AI CIC. Impressions were taken and I’m being fitted tomorrow. My question is: what do I need to know or what should I ask the audi? From doing some research I’ve discovered that the antenna on these devices actually sticks out a really long way - to the point where one audi on his YouTube channel described them almost as antennas for contacting aliens - they were that no…
IIC Choice - Starkey Evolv 2400 IIC vs Phonak Virto P90 Titanium
I’m looking to change to an IIC option, and don’t require any wireless/BT features. I just want the best sound quality across speech, music, TV, outdoors, plus reliability, and hopefully an accompanying App to make simple adjustments. They’re very similarly priced and I can’t find much difference between either choice. Does anyone have a user opinion on either or both of these, or a professional that knows both and can offer some insight please?
@paulthompson974 said:

What attracts me to the Starkey is the fact that it can do 55 million personalised adjustments every hour.

Sorry but you can’t always believe the manufacturer’s hype/blurb ; )

Paul, what’s your like. The new Starkey Evolvs are good but have had an issue with their feedback management system. Given that are already prone to feedback, if you have a large high-frequency loss I’d probably lean towards Phonak.

@Louie said:

The new Starkey Evolvs are good but have had an issue with their feedback management system.

Hello @Louie Do you have this information somewhere available….
I trialed the Evolves 2400 and now have the Phonak’s P90 Virto.

For me I had some feedback problems (in my right ear) with the Phonak. Could also have to do with the fittings maybe, as I found the Starkeys to be tighter molded then the Phonak. Thereto I have to say that the ear impressions where made by different Audie’s…. and I lean towards the meaning that in my case it could have to do with leakage because of that. Although it could also be the brand/ factory made venting which they made for my specific hearing loss and the form of my external eartunnel. There are so many influencing factors making me uncertain and make me wondering.

But I like to read as much information as available, just interested.

Edited

@Emile030 you’re 100% right. There are too many variable’s- vent size, mould depth and fit, gain etc. I say what i did about the evolvs becuse several auds in my company have mentioned clients returning their Evolvs due to feedback. In one instance i fit a guy who had 9 year old Starkey Soundlens with new Evolv 2400 IIC. We made the moulds and vent sizes LITERALLY IDENTICAL to his older stakey aids because he loved them (I actually sent his old aids in for Starkey to scan and replicate). The Evolvs had sooo much feedback, even when i programmed them identically to his older Soundlens devices. In other words, I kept all the variables constant and the feedback manager on the Evolvs was horrible compared to a 9 year old platform.

@Louie said:

the variables constant and the feedback manager on the Evolvs was horrible compared to an 9 year old platform.

Thanks @Louie for your interesting explanation and sharing this observation. A highly scientific one by really keeping all those variables unchanged, even the scanned molds! Not possible to reduce the feedback in an acceptable way.

Can one really scratch the hairs on ones head to imagine how this is possible. (Luckeley I do not have many). Hearing indeed is a very complicated nearly and partly not understandable matter for human beings.

Related discussions