I would like how is it different did they went from recording 12 million sound sources to 20???
cause those 2.0 doesn’t say anything
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
This topic is closed.
217 replies15.2k viewsLast reply
I would like how is it different did they went from recording 12 million sound sources to 20???
cause those 2.0 doesn’t say anything
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Yes. This is true.
The performance claims made here by Oticon are only slight:
![]()
A 15% improvement in speech comprehension. This is similar to the improvements made by Lumity.
Not being negative, but either our expectations are too high, or it’s just very unlikely in 2 year increments that we are going to get a real game changer in terms of performance improvements.
My eyes go to the “35% more access to speech cues than Oticon Real.” What they seem to be saying in their videos is that this new product will enable users to process multiple speakers in the soundscape simultaneously. There might only be a 15% improvement in speech comprehension with any given speaker, but in the past the sound processing could only be done for one speaker at a time. If the there is now the capacity to deal with multiple speakers, that is a game changer.
Also the fact that these upgrades are being stated as compared to the Real, that is very significant because it is a comparison with their own top-of-the-line equipment. So often these claims are based on a “comparison with other leading brands” - whoever they might be, but obviously chosen to give the claimant the best possible comparison. We know what the Real is capable of, so this kind of improvement is significant even if it’s just 10-15%.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
But can your brain process multiple speakers at once? The brain of those with hearing loss has its limitations.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
I would like how is it different did they went from recording 12 million sound sources to 20???
cause those 2.0 doesn’t say anything
20 million for what?
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.

. Yes. Only last year The Resound Nexia was a 150% improvement. What was the baseline to start off with?
In all seriousness, I know they have to whip up some excitement to get people to buy new aids, but in a world full of measurements and tests, there doesn’t seem to be an easily understood consumer benchmark, against each affected group, mild/moderate/severe/profound etc, that states the effectiveness of an aid in real world situations - quiet/noise etc. Although I do know there are tests that are conducted in studies and research papers.
Hearing Tracker are trying to do this to be fair but the industry as a whole doesn’t seem that transparent.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
i assume that user246 is talking about the DNN 2.0 training with 20 million sound sources
I must have missed it, but where were 20 million reported?
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Well, it doesn’t work like that, does it? Regardless of what the percent of improvement is, you never get to 100%.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
@Baltazard said: (unavailable)TBH, those HA manufacturer since they’ve started marketing their products with an average 5% improvement each year, we should be at 250% better at hearing, technicaly we could hear a wisper from planet Mars
best comment ever ![]()
![]()
![]()
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
- new Deep Neural Network 2.0.
- MoreSound Intelligence™ 3.0.
- new Sirius™ platform.
The new Sirius platform indicates to me this is a chip upgrade (New design) from the Polaris chip that is used in More and Real .
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
i assume that user246 is talking about the DNN 2.0 training with 20 million sound sources
I must have missed it, but where were 20 million reported?
The version 1 of the Oticon was trained on only 2 million around scenes, not 12 like it was mentioned. I think the 12 to 20 was just probably arbitrarily thrown out for jest without trying to be accurate.
The source of the 2 million sound scenes for the original DNN training can be found in the Oticon technical white paper for the MoreSound Intelligence, which is the name they give for the DNN.
I haven’t seen any new white paper for the Intent yet, so I don’t know what the DNN 2.0 has over the DNN 1.0.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
- self-calibrating speaker.
- 4D.
- new Deep Neural Network 2.0.
- MoreSound Intelligence™ 3.0.
- new Sirius™ platform.
incremental features?
maybe not.
It’s kinda weird how Oticon now separates out MoreSound Intelligence from the . The DNN is inside the MoreSound Intelligence technology and there are indeed a few other features beside the DNN as part of the MoreSound Intelligence. But there has been no indication that the MoreSound Intelligence on the Real is called 2.0 (assuming that the MoreSound Intelligence in the More is 1.0).
The assumption is that the Real is only different from the More with the 2 new features for sudden sound and wind management. Now it seems to imply that the Real MoreSound Intelligence technology is better than the More’s, which is something new not revealed until now to me
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
I know that 2.0 is on the Intent ( 2.0). What I was saying is that if MoreSound Intelligence 3.0 is on the Intent, then MoreSound Intelligence 2.0 must be on the Real (and consequently MoreSound Intelligence 1.0 is on the More). But I didn’t get any impression at all that MoreSound Intelligence is any different between the More and the Real at all.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
The 57% improvement in output before feedback ‘could’ be 2dB.
In terms of power 3dB is technically a doubling of output (though humans don’t be necessarily appreciate this change in intensity the same) so 57% would appear to be about 2/3 of that.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Same here, no updates available yet, can’t be far away with the intent release available now.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Hearing Aids0 replies
Fitting Software Requests1.1k replies
Fitting Software Requests512 replies
Hearing Aids104 replies
Uncategorized451 replies