Technically, it looks like a simple thing to implement with huge benefits. I guess I’m wondering what’s the hold up? Unless there are genuine limitations with the XMEMS speakers that make them unsuitable.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
This topic is closed.
5 replies497 viewsLast reply
Technically, it looks like a simple thing to implement with huge benefits. I guess I’m wondering what’s the hold up? Unless there are genuine limitations with the XMEMS speakers that make them unsuitable.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Yes, because: Recent BA (balanced armature) receivers technology is proven. Production lines are accomodated for recent BA receivers. Manufacturers’ orders and commitments. Amortization of R&D and production lines cost. Cost of licences for xMEMS? (probably) Reportedly still excess energy consumption by xMEMS.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Since the news appeared here on Hearing Tracker, I have been trying to learn more about this technology and I honestly had hopes for the new Phonak , but that was not the case.
From what I have read, Xmems should be used with HAs and therefore self-adjusting. They should also have an excellent frequency range with enough gain to be suitable even for severe/profound losses like mine. All this combined with a more affordable price compared to the current prescription HAs.
Now I wonder, is all this pure utopia? Will the lobbies of HA manufacturers and audiologists/hearing aid specialists ever allow it?
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
As I know, XMEMS consumes too much electricity, so it (maybe) cannot work with newest processors in hearing aids.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
You’re ignoring this member’s posts.
Hearing Aids6 replies
Uncategorized452 replies
Fitting Software Requests515 replies
Hearing Aids106 replies
Fitting Software Requests1.1k replies